Item Coversheet

Agenda Item No: 8.






AGENDA REPORT

DATE:

October 20, 2020 

TO:

Mayor and City Council

FROM:

Stefan T. Chatwin, City Manager


SUBJECT:Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 2020-18 of the City Council of the City of Fairfield Amending Section 25.28.7.K of the Fairfield City Code to Amend the Interim Use Permit Regulations for Nonconforming Land Uses in the Train Station Specific Plan Area

RECOMMENDED ACTION 
Provide second reading and adopt Ordinance 2020-18.
STATEMENT OF ISSUE 
The City has received a request to amend the Train Station Specific Plan Overlay District’s nonconforming use section of the Zoning Ordinance. The requested amendment would allow for new nonconforming uses to be permitted in the Train Station Specific Plan (TSSP) area for a limited period of time with an Interim Use Permit (IUP).
DISCUSSION

In the late 1990s, the City acquired approximately 10 acres at the southeast corner of Peabody Road and Vanden Road for a new multi-modal rail station to serve residents of Fairfield and surrounding cities. To facilitate compatible development around the new station, the City adopted the TSSP and associated zoning provisions.

Much of the land in the immediate vicinity of the train station was outside the City limits when the TSSP was adopted, but subsequently annexed in 2013. The area supports a number of existing land uses that are not consistent with the Specific Plan. To address these inconsistencies and incompatibilities, Zoning Ordinance provisions allow for non-conforming uses to continue to operate for a limited period after annexation through the review and approval of an IUP. Subject to zoning requirements, uses which receive an IUP must dedicate right of way to the City for road widening improvements. 

The requested amendment allows for the introduction of new non-conforming uses, similar to existing non-conforming uses, to be permitted in the TSSP area for limited periods with an IUP. Staff has prepared proposed amendments to the TSSP Non-conforming Use regulations (Section 25.28.7.K of the Zoning Ordinance) to facilitate the request. In addition to the dedication of road right-of-way, staff is proposing a requirement that introduced non-conforming uses also dedicate to the City any land on its property that is planned for a public stormwater detention basin. Such dedications typically do not occur immediately, but rather via an instrument that defers the dedication until such time the land is needed by the City. Staff has also included a variety of additional cleanup amendments to the TSSP Non-conforming Use section. The amendments can be summarized as follows:

 

  1. Revising the header of subsection E from “Uses Which Become Nonconforming Due to Annexation” to “Nonconforming Uses” in order to broaden the regulations to any nonconforming use.
     
  2. Revisions to the filing timeframe for Interim Use Permit applications. The amendment allows for applications to be made within one year of the proposed Ordinance rather than 6 months of the previous Ordinance. This will give staff additional time over the coming year to bring all existing non-conforming uses into compliance with the amended code.
     
  3. Revisions and additions allowing for nonconforming uses to be introduced, provided that the use does not impede the intended development of the TSSP. 

  4. A regulation addition requiring property owners to make an irrevocable offer of dedication for internal streets and detention basins as part of an Interim Use Permit for an introduced nonconforming use. The dedication shall be subject to the policies and guidelines provided in the TSSP.

  

Staff supports the proposed request, in that the City may need right of way dedication prior to development demand for the TSSP. Furthermore, the City would continue to control the time period any new interim uses are allowed, ensuring the City can continually assess the conditions supporting development in the area and terminate IUPs when appropriate. In whole, allowing non-conforming uses to operate under an IUP benefits both the City and landowner, as uses that would otherwise not be permitted may operate for a limited period of time and the City can obtain needed right of way with a minimum of cost to the taxpayers. 

Environmental Review
Staff determined the proposed Ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, as there is no possibility it will have a significant adverse effect on the environment. The Ordinance consists of minor amendments to the Zoning Code to allow for the possible continuance or introduction of nonconforming uses on an interim basis but does not entitle any such use. A potential project enabled under the amendments is required to first obtain an Interim Use Permit from the City and is subject to environmental review in accordance with CEQA. Accordingly, adoption of the Ordinance does not have the potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. Staff further finds that the proposed Ordinance is exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, which exempts permitting or minor alterations to existing facilities involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use, and under Section 15305, which exempts minor alterations in land use limitations in areas with an average slope of less than 20% which do not result in any changes in land use or density.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There are limited direct financial impacts to the City. Applicants for Interim Use Permits will continue to pay application fees and, when appropriate, Building permit fees. 
CITY COUNCIL WORKPLAN 
Community Safety
 Community Infrastructure Quality of Life
Financial and Operational Sustainability Economic Development Travis Air Force Base

City Council Goal this item supports: 
Economic Development
 

Project:
One-time item not recommended for including in the Workplan
PUBLIC CONTACT/ADVISORY BODY RECOMMENDATION 

At its August 12, 2020 meeting, the Planning Commission held a public hearing that was duly noticed in the Daily Republic on August 22, 2020. At said meeting, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2020-14 recommending Council adopt the Ordinance.

 

At its September 15, 2020 meeting, the City Council held a public hearing that was duly noticed in the Daily Republic on September 5, 2020. At said meeting, the City Council approved the introduction and first reading of Ordinance 2020-018.


ALTERNATIVE ACTION 
The City Council may choose to not adopt the Ordinance or requested amendments. 
STAFF CONTACT 
Meily Sheehan, Senior Planner
(707) 428-7474
msheehan@fairfield.ca.gov

COORDINATED WITH 
City Attorney's Office
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Proposed Ordinance
REVIEWERS:
ReviewerActionDate
AnswererApproved10/5/2020 - 1:22 PM
Feinstein, DavidApproved10/5/2020 - 1:42 PM
Gassaway, DavidApproved10/5/2020 - 3:27 PM
Alexander, AmberApproved10/9/2020 - 12:07 PM
Alexander, AmberApproved10/9/2020 - 12:08 PM